These $150 transparent earbuds offer audiophiles something AirPods Pro don't
These $150 transparent earbuds offer audiophiles something AirPods Pro don't
‘ZDNET Recommends’: What exactly does it mean?
ZDNET’s recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.
When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers.
ZDNET’s editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form.
These $150 transparent earbuds offer audiophiles something AirPods Pro don’t
June Wan/ZDNET
I’m not an audiophile — far from it — but I’ve listened to my fair share of headphones and earbuds to know what’s good and bad, and what features make one greater than the other.
I also know a chic piece of tech when I see one.
Also: The best noice-canceling earbuds (and how they work)
While the ultimate decider of what product is king is, well, each individual’s eyes and ears, I’ve spent the past two weeks with the Nothing Ear 2 — you probably don’t need any pun-tastic introductions of the company at this point — and can’t help but shake my head at how this two-year-old, London-based startup now has a pair of earbuds that goes toe to toe with the industry’s best.
The new earbuds, which go on sale today for $150, look great and sound even better. Nothing has kept the design of the Ear 2 roughly the same as the original Ear 1, with two semi-transparent buds housed in a see-through charging case. The industrial design, in and of itself, helps the Ear 2 stand out from a market full of monotone-colored earpieces. Check out the unboxing experience below.
Nothing says it’s made some changes to the plastic throughout the body this time around, opting for a smoother material that’s more resistant to scratches. (Remember, transparent plastic is the bane of micro-scratches. Owners of clear phone cases should know best.) This shift in design is a subtle yet meaningful change that I noticed right away. The overall footprint of the Ear 2 has gotten smaller, too.
The Nothing Ear 2 (white) is noticeably smaller than the Ear 1 (black).
June Wan/ZDNET
So, what if I told you that even with the shrinkage, the Nothing Ear 2 comes with a superior audio diaphragm than its predecessor and gets a bump in battery life (from 32 hours to 36 hours)? The company tells me that the new custom diaphragm within the buds features soft polyurethane (PU) for more accurate reproduction of low frequencies and graphene for sustaining through high frequencies. Basically, the Ear 2 sound lifelike, heavy enough on the bass to scratch an itch, and true to artists’ intentions.
Also: I sweat so much it damages earbuds. Here’s what I run with now
Perhaps the most valuable spec with the Ear 2 is its LHDC 5.0 codec compatibility, allowing them to tap into hi-res audio from supported platforms like Apple Music, Tidal, and more. Even Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 can’t play in hi-res, lossless audio which, at this point, is a consistent shortcoming. The feature is not a deal breaker by any means, but it’s certainly glorious that audiophiles have reasons to be more drawn to Nothing’s $150 earbuds than Apple’s $249 pair.
Nothing says the Ear 2 will only be available in white… for now.
June Wan/ZDNET
My complaints with the Ear 2 are more nitpicks than objective criticism: Closing the charging case produces a loud clack no matter how gently I shut it and the disconnect chime is louder than I’d prefer. I’ve also found the squeeze-based gestures more reliable than the companion app’s adaptive noise-canceling mode.
Review: Nothing Phone 1: You ain’t seen Nothing yet
We’ve hit a plateau in the wireless earbuds space, with most manufacturers now keeping their upgrades incremental and designs on the safer end. That leaves room for newer players like Nothing to take a leap of faith at consumers, like myself, who long for something new, fresh, and just as good. The Ear 2 deliver on those facets, and their $150 price tag is the icing on the cake.
Featured reviews
About The Author
Add a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.